Strengthening international cooperation on sustainable urbanisation: nature-based solutions for restoration and rehabilitation of urban ecosystems

Inicio / Programas UE / H2020 / SC5-13-2018-2019
Logo

(SC5-13-2018-2019) - STRENGTHENING INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION ON SUSTAINABLE URBANISATION: NATURE-BASED SOLUTIONS FOR RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION OF URBAN ECOSYSTEMS

Programme: Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Call: Greening the economy in line with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) EU

Topic description

Specific Challenge:

Unsustainable, non-resilient urbanisation patterns, the expansion or neglect of urban areas have caused the fragmentation, depletion and destruction of habitats, biodiversity loss and the degradation of ecosystems and their services. Increasing connectivity between existing, modified and new ecosystems and restoring and rehabilitating them within cities and at the urban-rural interface through nature-based solutions[1], is necessary to enhance ecosystem resilience and adaptive capacity to cope with the effects of climate and global changes and to enable ecosystems to deliver their services for more liveable, healthier and resilient cities.

Scope:

Actions should develop models, tools, decision support systems, methodologies, strategies, guidelines, standards and approaches for the design, construction, deployment and monitoring of nature-based solutions and restoration, prevention of further degradation, rehabilitation and maintenance measures for urban and peri-urban ecosystems and the ecological coherence and integrity of cities. Actions should review and capitalise upon existing experiences and good practices in Europe and (for option a) China or (for option b) CELAC. The strategies and tools should be part of an integrated and ecologically coherent urban planning and city-making process that would secure a fair and equitable distribution of benefits from the restored urban ecology and limit its exposure to environmental stresses. Methodologies, schemes and indicators should be developed to allow for the assessment of the cost-effectiveness of the restoration measures, also accounting for their possible negative effects. They should account for the totality of the benefits delivered by the restored ecosystems in terms of, for example, enhancing cities’ climate-proofing and resilience, enhancing mitigation options, improving human health and well-being, reducing inequalities and reducing cities’ environmental footprint. Actions should also dedicate efforts to awareness raising, outreach activities and education of citizens, including school children about the benefits of nature for their social, economic and cultural well-being.

Actions should bring together European and – depending on the option chosen – Chinese or CELAC research partners, government agencies and urban authorities, private sector and civil society with relevant expertise and competence and foster participatory engagement in urban ecological restoration actions. Further to the eligibility and admissibility conditions applicable to this topic, proposals are encouraged to ensure, to the extent possible, an appropriate balance in terms of effort and/or number of partners between the EU and the international partners, which would correspond to their respective ambition, objectives and envisaged work. This would enhance the impact of the actions and the mutual benefits for both the EU and the international partners.

In line with the strategy for EU international cooperation in research and innovation (COM(2012)497), international cooperation is encouraged. Proposals should pay attention to the special call conditions for this topic.

To ensure that knowledge, evidence and capacity developed within the framework of this topic covers an as broad range of conditions and urban contexts as possible across Europe, urban and peri-urban areas and ecosystems funded through projects under sub-topic a) are not invited to sub-topic b). Exceptions may be made on a case-by-case basis, provided that applicants can duly and convincingly justify the added value – in terms of additional knowledge, evidence and capacity regarding nature-based solutions for restoration and rehabilitation of urban ecosystems – of addressing the same area(s) under sub-topic b) in addition to them being covered through a project funded under sub-topic a). The appropriate use of Horizon 2020 resources in funding such cases will be assessed during the evaluations and the potential granting process.

The participation of social sciences and humanities disciplines, addressing also the gender dimension, is crucial to properly address this topic. Cooperation and synergies with the activities undertaken within the Covenant of Mayors initiative for Climate and Energy[2] initiative (supported by the EC) should be sought where appropriate.

Actions should address only one of the following sub-topics:

a) Strengthening EU-China collaboration (2018)

This topic is part of the EU-China flagship initiative on Environment and Sustainable Urbanisation which aims at promoting substantial coordinated and balanced research and innovation cooperation between the EU and China.

China-based participants have the possibility to apply for funding under the Chinese co-funding mechanism and other Chinese sources[3].

b) Strengthening EU-CELAC collaboration (2019)

The possibility for participants from some CELAC countries to apply for funding under national co-funding mechanism should be explored[3].

The Commission considers that proposals requesting a contribution from the EU in the range of EUR 5 million would allow this specific challenge to be addressed appropriately. Nonetheless, this does not preclude submission and selection of proposals requesting other amounts.

Expected Impact:

The project results are expected to contribute to:

  • restored and functioning urban ecosystems with an enhanced capacity to deliver their services;
  • making a business and investment case for nature-based solutions on the basis of increased evidence about the positive and negative impacts from restored urban ecosystems with regards to urban liveability, climate change resilience, social inclusion, urban regeneration, public health and well-being;
  • guidelines for cost effective urban ecosystem restoration and ecological rehabilitation measures and new planning approaches and methods.
Cross-cutting Priorities:

Clean Energy
International cooperation
RRI
Socio-economic science and humanities
Gender
Open Innovation

[1]A definition is provided in the introductory text of this Work Programme

[2]www.covenantofmayors.eu

[3]See http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/cross-cutting-issues/international-cooperation_en.htm#support-non-eu-countries

[4]See http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/cross-cutting-issues/international-cooperation_en.htm#support-non-eu-countries

Keywords

Knowledge transfer Knowledge infrastructure Sustainable development and nature protection Sustainable design (for recycling, for environment Nature conservation Ecosystem management Social issues Natural resources and environmental economics Ecosystem services provided by soils Biodiversity conservation Sustainable innovation Cost estimation / analysis Spatial and regional planning Habitat and species restoration and rehabilitation Environmental change and society Environmental regulations and climate negotiations Spatial assessment and evaluation Biological systems analysis, modelling and simulat Cultural studies, cultural diversity Knowledge and Technology transfer Knowledge management Social sciences, interdisciplinary Participatory Innovation Public participation Knowledge translation Scenario and decision simulation Environmental sciences Ecology Systems-Services Functions Environmental health Political systems and institutions, governance New Economic models beyond GDP Socioeconomic stressors Environment, resources and sustainability Public and environmental health Climatology and climate change

Tags

Ecosystem Human health Territorial resilience Coastal areas Resilience big data Ecosystem-based solutions Vulnerability biodiversity enhnacment provisioning services Governance model Ecosystem services climate policy Environmental stressors River flood Disaster risk reduction natural water retention science biodiversity forward-looking decision making behavioural economics transition Ecological resilience Natural capital enhancement Natural capital conservation Trans-disciplinary approach Drought social sciences and humanities governments policy tools scientific organizations Risk reduction models Nature conservation earth-climate system Human Well-being Disaster resilience Ecosystem-based approach climate resilience natural resources natural resource consumption Ecosystem restoration Disaster risk management Business models adaptation Ecosystem-based adaptation capacity building environment and climate policy Natural areas Governance framework Multi-stakeholder approach societal Environmental resilience environmental biodiversity scenarios indigenous and local communities information and knowledge ecosystem service scenarios CO2 business models systemic Biodiversity conservation Socio-economic resilience socio-economic Climate change adaptation Nature-based solutions climate adaptation Ecosystems assessments carbon sequestration green infrastructure policy support Ecosystem protection global change Ecosystem degradation decision support Governance arrangements Wellbeing Academia Risk management scenario development applied natural sciences Environmental restoration Disaster risk prevention

Non atopas a financiación que precisas?

Contacta con nos e cóntanos cal é o teu proxecto.